Disposed¶20

Sh Krishan v. Minicipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC13 Feb 2026W.P.(C)/2072/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Unauthorised/unauthorized construction; building bye-laws violation; absence of sanction plan; encroachment on public street; H. No. 511 Village Bijwasan New Delhi-110062; MCD booking of property and work stop notice; direction to municipal corporation to act in accordance with law; pending civil suit between same parties; Delhi High Court writ petition disposed; Judge Amit Bansal; order dated 13.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with direction to MCD to take appropriate action in accordance with law; petitioner at liberty to take appropriate remedies for any further grievance regarding unauthorized construction; all rights, contentions and legal remedies of respondent no.3 kept open; CM APPL. 10165/2026 (exemption from filing certified/legible/typed copies) allowed subject to all just exceptions. ¶20

Sh Krishan Vs Minicipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~37

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2072/2026 with CM APPL. 10165/2026 & CM APPL. 10166/2026

¶4

SH KRISHAN .....Petitioner Through: Advocate (appearance not given) versus

¶5

MINICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Deekshant Kumar, Mr. Ajay and Mr. Ashutosh, Advocates for R-3.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶7

O R D E R % 13.02.2026

¶8

CM APPL. 10165/2026 (seeking exemption from filing certified/ legible/ typed copies of documents, etc.)

¶9

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

¶11

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent/ MCD to take action against the unauthorized construction being carried out by the respondent no.3 at property bearing address H. No. 511, Village Bijwasan, New Delhi-110062 in violation of the building bye-laws and without any sanction plan.

¶12

It is submitted that the respondent no.3 has also encroached upon the

¶13

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 13:00:11

¶16

public street. Photographs have been filed along with the petition.

¶17

A complaint in this regard was made with the respondent/ MCD on 29^th January, 2026.

¶18

Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.3 on advance notice submits that a civil suit has been filed by the petitioner against the respondent no.3, which is currently pending before the trial court.

¶19

Counsel for the petitioner submits that no relief qua unauthorized construction or encroachment has been claimed in the said civil suit. 7. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/ MCD submits that pursuant to the aforesaid complaint made the petitioner, the subject property has been booked on 9^th February, 2026 and a ‘work stop notice’ has also been issued.

¶20

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent/ MCD to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶21

In the event the petitioner has any further grievance with regard to unauthorized construction, he is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶22

All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the respondent no.3 are kept open.

¶23

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶24

FEBRUARY 13, 2026

Vivek/-

Page 2 of 2

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 13:00:11

Sh Krishan v. Minicipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh Krishan v. Minicipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gowhar Amin Shah Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anil Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Jai Chand Vs Union of India and Ors.

Akil Ahmad & Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ramjas School & Anr. Vs Directorate of Education and Anr.

Kalyan Singh Vs Ld. District and Session Judge, Hq Delhi

Surinder Singh & Ors. Vs Ramjas School & Ors.

Ramesh Vs M/S Ganesh Industries

Nazir Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Anr.

Nikhlesh Vs Sudhir Kumar S.H.O. & Ors.

Pradeep Mahalwal Vs the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Sunita Devi Vs Bses Rajdhani Power Limited (Brpl)

Surender Kumar Sharma Vs Rajesh Ramnani, Chairman of the Monitoring Committee of Ansal Urban Condominiums Private Limited, &

Ravindar Singh Kang (President of Proposed Political Party Popular Party of India) Vs Election Commission of India