Arvind Dham through Authorized Representative Mr Anubhav Dham v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court, W.P.(C) 1842/2026, decided 09.02.2026, Jasmeet Singh, J. Petition by Arvind Dham through authorised representative Anubhav Dham versus Canara Bank under Article 226 read with Section 227, Constitution of India, seeking writ of certiorari to quash Impugned Communication dated 31.01.2026 issued by the Bank and writ of mandamus prohibiting action in furtherance thereof including reporting to investigative agency(ies) under the relevant RBI Circular. Disposed of without adjudication on merits after respondent's counsel (Ms. Anju Jain) handed over letter dated 09.02.2026 undertaking supply of documents sought by petitioner's letter dated 06.02.2026; Court ordered supply or status intimation, minimum 04 weeks for a meaningful reply, and personal hearing after at least 02 weeks thereafter. Exemption application CM APPL. 8910/2026 allowed subject to just exceptions. Keywords: certiorari, mandamus, bank communication, document supply, reply, personal hearing, disposal.