Mr Markand Adhikari Vs Punjab National Bank and Anr.

“a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing/setting aside the proceedings being undertaken by the Respondent No. 1 Bank for declaring the Petitioner and the account of M/s SAB Global Entertainment Media Pvt. Ltd. as ‘fraud’ including the Show Cause Notice dated 28.04.2025 and Notice of personal hearing dated 23.01.2026 and all consequential actions arising therefrom, as

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:04:37

¶19

being illegal, arbitrary, non-est in law, and in violation of the principles of natural justice and the RBI Master Directions on Fraud;

¶20

Mr. Deepak, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, states that in the present case, the petitioner has sought documents from the respondent No. 1 Bank, which was also directed by this Court in the earlier round of litigation being W.P.(C) 18811/2025 vide order dated 11.12.2025. The relevant paragraph from the said reads as under:-

¶21

“10. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of taking the assurance of PNB on record. The documents sought by the Petitioner, as aforementioned, shall be supplied to the Petitioner within 15 days from today. Reply shall be filed to the show cause notice by the Petitioner within 21 days from the date of receipt of the documents in consonance with Clause 2.1.1.2 of the Reserve Bank of India (Fraud Risk Management in Commercial Banks (including Regional Rural Banks) and All India Financial Institutions) Directions, 2024, whereafter it will be open to PNB to pass an order, in accordance with law, after affording personal hearing to the Petitioner. In light of this, any personal hearing scheduled in the meantime will be deferred. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.”

¶22

Despite the orders, the respondent No. 1 Bank has not supplied the documents and has fixed a personal hearing for 10.02.2026.

¶23

Mr. Deepak, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, states that all the documents mentioned in the letter dated 19.01.2026 have not been

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:04:37

¶26

supplied which are important for the petitioner to give a meaningful response and without which the hearing of 10.02.2026 will be an empty formality.

¶27

For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶28

Mr. Rout, learned standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1 Bank and states that whatever documents available with the petitioner as per the list dated 19.01.2026 will be provided and the other documents which are not available will also be informed to the petitioner within a period of one week from today.

¶29

Within 21 days from the date of receipt of the letter/communication from the respondent No. 1 Bank, the petitioner shall file a reply to the show cause notice and thereafter, the respondent No. 1 Bank shall give a notice for personal hearing.

¶30

The date of personal hearing i.e ., 10.02.2026 stands cancelled.

¶31

Without prejudice to the other rights and contentions of the parties, the present petition is disposed of along with pending applications, if any.

¶32

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶33

FEBRUARY 6, 2026/DM

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:04:37

Mr Markand Adhikari v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Markand Adhikari v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaslon Oversea Vs Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax GST

Sanjeev Agarwal Vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 & Ors.

Karamveer and Ors. Vs MCD and Ors.

Hemant Sharma Vs Rail Land Development Authority and Anr.

Smt Laxmi Devi Educational Institute Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anuj Vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

Sri Saudan Singh Institute of Higher Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Smt Harpyari Devi Girls Degree College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Pankaj Tandon Vs Reserve Bank of India and Anr.

Shri Ukabhai Dodiya B.Ed. College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Smt. Asha Vs Delhi Development Authority

Ram Sharan Roy Private Iti Vs Directorate General of Training and Anr.

Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited Vs M/S Ess Ess Technofabs Private Limited

Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited Vs M/S Ess Ess Technofabs Private Limited