The Court, at this stage, is not inclined to entertain the petition but grants liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pending representation before the concerned Authorities. Accordingly, the petition and the pending application are disposed of. No substantive legal principle is laid down in this interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SRI DEEPAK KUMAR SAHU .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Puneet Relan, Mr. Puru Mudgal, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 06.01.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JANUARY 6, 2026 aks/ksr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/01/2026 at 12:18:03
Sri Deepak Kumar Sahu
Union of India
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
