Petitioner sought a passport; the Regional Passport Office informed the court it had already been granted as requested. Respondent no.2 was left free to pursue legal recourse, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Passport granted by respondent no.1; petition withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
MITHILA MURADA
.....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao with Mr. Jai Shanker, Mr. Manoj Makhija and Mr. Lochan Rajput, Advocates.
versus
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:54:52
applications also stand disposed of.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2026 tr/ap
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:54:52
Mithila Murada
The Regional Passport Office
Respondent No. 2
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
