Petitioners, represented by counsel, submitted that their representations were being considered by the Government and wished not to press the writ petition. The Court recorded this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
KAVITA KUMARI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Mr. Anuj Agarwal, Mr. Kumar Utkarsh & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.
versus
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat SC GNCTD Services, Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms Aliza Alam, & Mr Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 17.02.2026
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 17, 2026 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/02/2026 at 13:03:38
Kavita Kumari & Ors.
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Ors.
Anil Kshetarpal
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
