Petitioner's counsel stated he had instructions to withdraw the writ petition; the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition along with the pending application as withdrawn, deciding no substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
M/S DYNAMED EQUIPMENTS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Bharadwaj and Ms. Garima Bharadwaj, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, GP with Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Adv. for UOI Mr. Puneet Taneja, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manmohan Singh Narula, Mr. Amit Yadav and Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, Advs. for R-3 Ms. Shweta Bharti, Ms Liz Thachet and Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advs. for R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R
% 12.02.2026
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026/ msh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 13:05:02
M/s Dynamed Equipments
Union of India
V. Kameswar Rao
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
