Disposed¶17

Shri Ukabhai Dodiya B.Ed. College v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Feb 2026W.P.(C)/1641/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(C) 1641/2026, Shri Ukabhai Dodiya B.Ed. College v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr., High Court of Delhi, Jasmeet Singh, J., order dated 05.02.2026; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of certiorari; NCTE; pending application dt. 05.02.2021 for shifting/change of premises; direction to decide representation within 8 weeks; petition disposed of; counsel Gaurav Arora (petitioner), Anuj Kapoor, Nandeesh Nanda, Shivom Sethi (respondents); no cases cited; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to hear and dispose of the petitioner's representation expeditiously, not later than 8 weeks; petitioner left at liberty to challenge the outcome if aggrieved. ¶17

Shri Ukabhai Dodiya B.Ed. College Vs National Council… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~64

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1641/2026 SHRI UKABHAI DODIYA B.ED. COLLEGE

¶4

.....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor Mr. Nandeesh Nanda Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 05.02.2026

¶9

This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer:

¶10

“(a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and direct the respondent no.2 to consider & decide the pending application dt. 05.02.2021, submitted by the petitioner for shifting of its premises, in accordance with law expeditiously in a time bound manner;”

¶11

Mr. Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the application for change of premise of the petitioner has not been decided for a considerable period of time by respondent No. 2.

¶12

For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶13

Mr. Kapoor, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents without admitting the averments made by the petitioner and subject to verification of the documents, he states that if the

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:14:17

¶16

application has not been decided so far, the same shall be done expeditiously and without admitting the averments made by the petitioner and subject to verification of the record.

¶17

Directing the respondent to hear and dispose of the representation of the petitioner expeditiously and not later than 8 weeks from today, the petition is disposed of.

¶18

In case the petitioner is aggrieved, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the outcome.

¶19

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 5, 2026 / (MS)

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:14:17

Shri Ukabhai Dodiya B.Ed. College v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Ukabhai Dodiya B.Ed. College v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijender Singh. Vs Globe Detective Agency Pvt. Ltd.

Kumari Pratiksha Vs Union of India & Ors.

Narendra Sharma Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Save India Foundation (Regd.) Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Mahender Singh & Anr. Vs the Dy. Secretary Land and Building Department Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Poonam Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sanjay Pahwa Vs Commissioner of Customs & Anr.

Ami Sisodiya Vs Gnct of Delhi & Ors.

Kumari Pratiksha Vs Union of India & Ors.

Surender Singh Vs All India Council for Technical Education Aicte

Smt. Kamlesh Vs Delhi Development Authority

Pradeep Kumar Gupta Vs DDA

Vijay Gupta Vs D.D.A

Pankaj Tandon Vs Reserve Bank of India and Anr.