Writ petition against Union Bank of India was disposed of after the petitioner's counsel stated it had been rendered infructuous. The court took the statement on record and disposed of the petition along with all pending applications as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
AMIT KATYAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh with Mr. Bakul Jain, Advs.
UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ekta Choudhary, Ms. Priya Rathi, Ms. Rushali Sikand, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MAY 5, 2026 Nc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 13:00:00
Amit Katyal
Union Bank of India
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
