Sanjay Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Service Law – HRA – Central Industrial Security Force
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court Division Bench (Anil Kshetarpal & Amit Mahajan, JJ.) order dated 21.05.2026 allowing a batch of 110 writ petitions led by W.P.(C) 8154/2024 (Ashish Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.) filed by serving CISF personnel seeking additional 5% House Rent Allowance by way of a mandamus. Court followed Jaspal Singh Mann v. Union of India & Ors., 2009 ILR 1 Delhi 165, as upheld by the Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. v. Paramisivan M., Civil Appeal No. 4967/2023 (order dated 08.02.2024), and rejected the Respondents' objection under Rule 61 of the CISF Rules, 2001 read with Office Memorandum dated 31.07.2017 as barred, directing release of dues within 03 months. Search terms: additional 5% HRA, house rent allowance, CISF, Central Industrial Security Force, Rule 61 CISF Rules 2001, OM 31.07.2017, mandamus, Jaspal Singh Mann, Paramisivan M.
What did the court decide?
All 110 writ petitions allowed in terms of Jaspal Singh Mann v. Union of India & Ors. (2009 ILR 1 Delhi 165): Respondents to grant the additional 5% HRA from the respective dates per chart 'C-1' and to release the amount payable to the Petitioners within 03 months.