Partly allowed

M/S Winsome Yarns Limited v. the Commissioner of Trade and Tax Department and Anr.

Delhi HC7 Sept 2026W.P.(C)/14977/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that the legal issue regarding the issuance of statutory forms was settled by a prior judgment. Directing respondents to issue forms upon receipt of an indemnity bond within one month, the two writ petitions were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to issue requisite statutory forms upon furnishing of an appropriate indemnity bond within one month.

M/S Winsome Yarns Limited Vs the Commissioner of Trade… — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~23 and 24

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CNR No. DLHC010383722023

¶4

- W.P.(C) 12665/2023 M/S AGRIM JEWELS .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Adv.[appearance not given.]

¶5

versus

¶6

THE COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Ms. Mahika Bisht, Advs. for GNCTD. Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak, Advs. for UOI.

¶7

(24)

¶8

# CNR No. DLHC010465072023

¶9

W.P.(C) 14977/2023 and CM APPL. 59820/2023

¶10

M/S WINSOME YARNS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Agnihotri, Adv.

¶11

versus

¶12

THE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAX DEPARTMENT AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Ms. Mahika Bisht, Advs. for GNCTD.

¶13

CORAM:

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

¶15

¶16

O R D E R 07.09.2026

¶17

There is no dispute between the parties that the issue which arises for consideration in the present Writ Petitions stands settled by

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:28:22

¶19

this Court in W.P.(C) 8272/2015 captioned Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Department of Trade & Taxes & Anr. , decided on 01.02.2016.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid position, the Respondents are directed to issue the requisite statutory forms, as prayed for by the respective Petitioners, upon furnishing of an appropriate indemnity bond, within a period of one month from the date of furnishing such bond.

¶21

With these observations, the present Writ Petitions, along with the pending application(s), are disposed of.

¶22

A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matter.

¶23

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶24

SHAIL JAIN, J.

¶25

SEPTEMBER 7, 2026 jai/ad

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:28:22

M/S Winsome Yarns Limited v. the Commissioner of Trade and Tax Department and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Winsome Yarns Limited v. the Commissioner of Trade and Tax Department and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mrs Tanya Chawla Arora & Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mohammad Imran Vs Commissioner of Customs Igi Airport T3 New Delhi

Kamlesh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Sgt Urmildas Manikpuree Vs Union of India and Ors.

Janesh Kumar through Wife and Next Friend Manju Bala Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rishav Dubey Vs Union of India & Ors.