Rambir Singh Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

“1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to forthwith consider and decide the Petitioner's PM-UDAY application bearing Case ID PMUDAY/CASE/23112025021047/1, submitted on 23.11.2025, within a fixed time frame as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court,

¶15

2. Direct the Respondents to grant ownership rights and execute the conveyance deed in favour of the Petitioner in respect of his residential property (UGF) bearing Plot Nos 217 & 218, situated at Gram Pustani Pochanpur Extension, Delhi-45, Colony Registration No. 1419, Village Pochanpur, South-West Delhi,

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 13:17:03

¶17

3. Award costs of the present petition in favour of the Petitioner,”

¶18

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is absolute occupant/owner of the Upper Ground floor of the residential property bearing Plot Nos. 217 and 218 situated in Gram Pustani Pochanpur Extension, Delhi45, Colony Registration No. 1419, Village Pochanpur, South-West Delhi, admeasuring approximately 185.620 square meters and comprised in Khasra Nos. 11/15/1, 15/2 and 16/1 (“ said property ”). The said colony was notified under the Pradhan Mantri Unauthorised Colonies in Delhi Awas Adhikar Yojana (“ PM-UDAY ”).

¶19

Subsequently, the petitioner submitted an application on 23.11.2025 seeking conferment of ownership rights and execution of conveyance deed in respect of the said property. However, the petitioner’s application is still pending.

¶20

Hence, the present petition.

¶21

Mr. Godara, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner’s application is pending since 23.11.2025.

¶22

For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶23

Ms. Kakar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents.

¶24

Since the petitioner is only seeking decision on his application and for the reasons stated in the petition, the petition is allowed and the respondents shall hear the petitioner and decide petitioner’s application under PM-UDAY scheme expeditiously and preferably within 5 months from today.

¶25

The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶26

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶27

FEBRUARY 2, 2026/DM

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 13:17:03

Rambir Singh v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambir Singh v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

UOI & Ors. Vs Kasturi Devi

Bhartiya Postal Emp Unoin & an Vs U.O.I & Anr.

Urmila Devi Vs UOI & Ors.

Attar Singh Kashyap Vs UOI & Ors.

Pravin Pandurang Mokal & Anr. Vs the District Medical Board

Lakshay Creation Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 60(7) Delhi

Rwa Dwarka Punarwas Colony (Regd.) Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Bhuneshwar Vats Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Ram Sunder Shukla and Ors. Vs DDA and Ors.

Hitraj Goswami Vs Joint Admission Committee (Jac) & Ors.

Sri Venkateswara College of Teacher Training Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Radha Bansal Vs Indian Bank

Meet Bhadresh Shah Vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors.

Shri R J Patel College of Education & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.