Disposed
G. S. Sodhi v. NTPC Ltd. and Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/13071/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition by a petitioner who had died; counsel stated the legal representatives showed no interest in continuing, and with no substitution application the petition was disposed of as abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~69
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 13071/2018
¶4
G. S. SODHI .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Advocate.
¶6
versus
¶7
NTPC LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kaustubh Anshuraj, Advocate for R-2.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
¶9
O R D E R % 19.03.2026
¶10
- Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Advocate, was representing Mr. G.S. Sodhi, the Petitioner, who has now deceased. He submits that the legal representatives of the deceased Petitioner have also contacted him and have not shown any interest in continuing with the present proceedings.
¶11
- In the absence of any application for substitution, and in light of the statement made by Mr. Sinha, the present petition has abated and is accordingly disposed of.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
G. S. Sodhi
- respondent
NTPC Ltd
Coram
AI extract
Sanjeev Narula
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court