Counsel sought withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the relief sought had already been granted; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without recording any findings on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
SHRI SATIRAM PRIVATE ITI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Mayank Manish & Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.
versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 19.03.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
MARCH 19, 2026/NG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 13:28:00
SHRI SATIRAM PRIVATE ITI
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
