Petitioner sought writ mandamus for release of tax refund under Delhi VAT Act. Respondent agreed to decide interest claim within one month. Petition disposed.
Refund release sought; interest claim to be decided within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
CNR No. DLHC010417512026
versus
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Batra, Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
%
O R D E R 07.09.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:28:06
in favour of the Petitioner. Pursuant thereto, the Petitioner filed Form DVAT-21 dated 30.05.2017, claiming refund of Rs.10,33,088/seeking credit thereof to its bank account.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
SHAIL JAIN, J.
SEPTEMBER 7, 2026 jai/hr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:28:06
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Futech Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd
Commissioner of Trade and Taxes
Anil Kshetarpal
Shail Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
