Petitioner unrepresented on multiple hearing dates; writ petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution along with pending application.
None granted; petition and pending application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER -I
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Yash Narain, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
APRIL 20, 2026
na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:19:03
SPML INFRA LTD (THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE)
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER -I
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
