The High Court disposed of the writ petition noting that substantial steps were taken by the respondent and the petitioner's grievance was mitigated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
SOLICITORS INDIA LAW OFFICES
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Sr Advocate with Ms Divyangna Malik and Ms Priyamvada Singh Solanki, Advocates. versus
MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel ( Civil ) / Gnctd, Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 21.04.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
APRIL 21, 2026 aks
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:32:55
Solicitors India Law Offices
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council
Anr.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
