The petitioner filed the petition. Counsel submitted the petition is rendered infructuous, and the respondent did not dispute this. The High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
Through: Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. B.K. Tripathi & Mr. Atul Babbar, Advs.
versus
CHIEF COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX DELHI 4 & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms.Easha Gurung, JSC, Mr. Nring Chamwibo Zeliang & Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R % 19.05.2026
DINESH MEHTA, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
MAY 19, 2026/ kk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 13:07:01
HANS METALS LTD.
CHIEF COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX DELHI
DINESH MEHTA
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
