Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a petition, claiming relief was already satisfied. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without making observations on the merits; pending applications were also disposed of.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition and pending applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
RASHMI MEHTA
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Lalit Sharma and Ms. Rudrakshi Gautam, Advocates.
versus
DEEPAK ROHILLA .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 04.07.2025
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, submitting that the relief claimed in the petition already stands satisfied.
The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn; without making any observations on the merits of the matter.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JULY 4, 2025/ ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:44:06
Rashmi Mehta
Deepak Rohilla
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a civil case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
