Dismissed
Ritu Rana v. Ankit Gahlot
Delhi HCTR.P.(C.)/133/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Transfer petition withdrawn after parties amicably settled the dispute by an out-of-court settlement; the court took the petitioner's vakalatnama on record and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request following out-of-court settlement.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~47
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- TR.P.(C.) 133/2023
¶4
- RITU RANA .....Petitioner
¶5
- Through: Mr. Kunal Saini, Advocate (through VC)
¶6
versus
¶7
ANKIT GAHLOT .....Respondent Through: None.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 17.11.2025
¶12
- Learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through video conferencing submits that although the vakalatnama has been filed vide Dairy No. 8217058/2025 on 15.11.2025, however, the same is not on record.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ritu Rana
- respondent
Ankit Gahlot
Coram
AI extract
Saurabh Banerjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court