Petitioner withdrew the petition pursuant to a predecessor bench's order; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
SH. DEEPAK LUTHRA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate.
versus
STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw & Mr. Gaurav Sindhwai, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 12.08.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 12, 2025/ at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:13:57
SH. DEEPAK LUTHRA
STATE & ORS.
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
