First appeal disposed of after parties filed a settlement application under Order 23 CPC. Counsel instead sought withdrawal under Order 23 Rule 1; the application was allowed and the appeal, with all pending applications, was dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn per settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
ANIL KOCHHAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra, Adv.
RAKESH GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Jahanvi Garg, Adv. alongwith respondent in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R
% 02.12.2025
CM APPL. 75752/2025 (under Order 23 Rules 1 & 3 of CPC)
RFA 451/2011 & CM APPLs. 22104/2011, 34288/2023, 66430/2025
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
DECEMBER 2, 2025/ bh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/12/2025 at 11:43:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn in terms of the parties' settlement/MOU dated 17.11.2025.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kochhar
Rakesh Gupta
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
