First appeal disposed of in terms of a Compromise Deed under which the appellant paid Rs.7,50,000/- to the respondent in full and final settlement. The respondent, appearing via videoconferencing, confirmed receipt and sought to withdraw the related execution proceedings; liberty was granted accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
VIKAS CHAUDHARY .....Appellant Through: Counsel (appearance not given). versus JAVID ALI .....Respondent Through: Respondent in-person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 11.12.2025
Pursuant to what was noted in last order dated 27.11.2025, the appellant has placed on record Compromise Deed dated 05.12.2025 (‘Compromise Deed’), which evidences that in full-andfinal settlement of their inter-se disputes, the respondent has received a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- from the appellant.
RFA 410/2025
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2025 at 11:43:09
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
DECEMBER 11, 2025/ ak
RFA 410/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2025 at 11:43:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal could be disposed of in terms of the Compromise Deed dated 05.12.2025 recording full and final settlement between the parties.
Vikas Chaudhary
Javid Ali
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
