Bharat Bhushan Mittal v. Vandna Gupta and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Delhi High Court; RC.REV. 364/2025; RC.REV. 366/2025; Bharat Bhushan Mittal; Vandna Gupta; eviction order; execution; warrants of possession; bailiff; learned ACJ; vacant and physical possession delivered to landlords; petitions infructuous; N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana (2003) 1 SCC 453; Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr. (Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008); Executing Court order dated 13.11.2025; possession taken 05.12.2025; petitions disposed of; Saurabh Banerjee, J.; order dated 11.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
Since the vacant and physical possession of the subject premises had already been received by the landlords pursuant to execution, in view of N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana (2003) 1 SCC 453 and Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr. (Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008), the present petitions have become infructuous, there being nothing remaining therein.