Wife sought transfer of husband's divorce petition from Dwarka to Rohini family courts citing health hardship and co-pendency. Court found no medical substantiation for travel hardship, noted her prior Section 19(2) HMA application had been dismissed and attained finality, and that personal presence was not required. Transfer petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
BHOOMI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meena Chaudhary, Advocate.
versus
GAURAV SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amitesh Gaurav, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 10.12.2025
TR.P.(C.) 42/2025 Page 1 of 4
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 13:36:20
run into approximately 94 pages. Relying thereupon, learned counsel submits that the petitioner’s health condition is causing her repeated hardship and also since she is residing alone, travelling from her present abode to the Dwarka Courts, Delhi has become increasingly difficult for her.
“Ld. Counsel for petitioner undertakes to pay litigation expenses online during the course of the day of respondent.
An application u/s 19 (2) of the HMA e-filed by the respondent. Copy of transfer petition moved by respondent before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and other documents also e-filed along with the application.
Respondent has prayed in this application that this court has no territorial jurisdiction and present petition may be returned to petitioner.
Petitioner in petition has pleaded that marriage was solemnized on 19.11.2018 at Green Garden, Near Rishikui School (Dwarka Flyover) Sector 7, Delhi.
Place of marriage as pleaded by the petitioner is admitted by the respondent.
TR.P.(C.) 42/2025 Page 2 of 4
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 13:36:20
Plea taken by the respondent that this court has no territorial jurisdiction is baseless. Hence, application filed by respondent u/s 19 (2) HMA is dismissed.”
TR.P.(C.) 42/2025 Page 3 of 4
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 13:36:20
always be free to claim adjustment/ benefit of an order passed by one Court in one proceeding in the proceeding(s) pending before another Court(s).
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
DECEMBER 10, 2025/So
TR.P.(C.) 42/2025 Page 4 of 4
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 13:36:20
1 issue framed by the court
Should the respondent's divorce petition pending at Dwarka Courts be transferred to Rohini Courts given the petitioner's health and other pending proceedings?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhoomi Sharma
Gaurav Sharma
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a civil case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
