Disposed

M/S Frontier Sales v. M/S Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC5 Dec 2025RC.REV./204/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Landlord-tenant revision petitions became infructuous after the tenants handed over vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to the landlords, being unable to pay occupation charges fixed earlier by the court. The petitions were disposed of with liberty to seek appropriate remedies.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of as infructuous with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

M/S Frontier Sales Vs M/S Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd. — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~44 to 47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 204/2017

¶4

M/S FRONTIER SALES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. P. Rana, Adv. (through VC) alongwith Mr. Aviral Jain, Proxy Counsel (M- 9811165700)

¶5

versus M/S SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Adv.

¶6

¶7

RC.REV. 205/2017

¶8

M/S FRONTIER SALES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. P. Rana, Adv. (through VC) alongwith Mr. Aviral Jain, Proxy Counsel (M- 9811165700)

¶9

versus

¶10

M/S SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD .....Respondent

¶11

Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Adv.

¶12

¶13

RC.REV. 206/2017

¶14

M/S FRONTIER SALES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. P. Rana, Adv. (through VC) alongwith Mr. Aviral Jain, Proxy Counsel

¶15

(M- 9811165700)

¶16

versus

¶17

M/S SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Adv.

¶18

¶19

RC.REV. 207/2017

¶20

M/S FRONTIER SALES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. P. Rana, Adv. (through VC)

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 11:54:28

¶23

alongwith Mr. Aviral Jain, Proxy Counsel (M- 9811165700)

¶24

versus

¶25

M/S SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Adv.

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s)/ tenant(s), appearing through video conferencing, at the very outset, submits that since the tenant(s) was/ were unable to pay user and occupation charges, as fixed by this Court vide order dated 17.11.2017, vacant, peaceful and physical possession of the subject premises has been handed over to the landlord(s).

¶28

As such, in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana : 2003(1) SCC 453 , Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr. : Civil Appeal Nos.5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008 , the present petitions have become infructuous as there is nothing remaining therein.

¶29

In view of the aforesaid, the present petitions are disposed of with liberty for the petitioner(s) to seek appropriate remedies available to him/ them, as and when required, in accordance with law.

¶30

A copy of this order be kept in all the connected matters.

¶31

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

¶32

DECEMBER 05, 2025/ bh

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 11:54:28

M/S Frontier Sales v. M/S Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Frontier Sales v. M/S Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeev Hiranandani Vs Sunny Grover

Reena Vs Vinay

Nupur Dua Vs Rohit Sharma

M/S Frontier Sales Vs M/S Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Frontier Sales Vs M/S Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd.

Smt Jasbir Kaur Deceased & Ors. Vs Sh Ram Kumar