Dismissed¶13

Nisha Singh & Anr. v. Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors.

Delhi HC21 Jul 2025OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)/38/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court enforcement/execution petitions dismissed for decree-holder non-appearance under Order IX Rule 8 CPC; OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 38/2019 (Nisha Singh & Anr.) and OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 51/2019 (Indu Sabharwal) versus judgement debtors Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors.; settlement and assignment of rights and interests in property; connected application EX.APPL.(OS) 226/2025 in OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 23/2019; bench: Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; dated 21.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Both OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 38/2019 and OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 51/2019 were dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of CPC as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. ¶13

Nisha Singh & Anr. Vs Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~O-63 and O-64

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 38/2019 NISHA SINGH & ANR. .....Decree Holders Through: None. versus

¶4

BHAI BALBIR SINGH & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Dhananjay Gupta, Mr.Suyash Darade and Mr.Ravi Sharma, Advocates for JD Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms.Anubha Goel and Mr.Mayank Joshi, Advocates for JD No. 8 to 10.

¶5

O-64

¶6

OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 51/2019 INDU SABHARWAL .....Decree Holder Through: None. versus BHAI BALBIR SINGH & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Dhananjay Gupta, Mr.Suyash Darade and Mr.Ravi Sharma, Advocates for JD Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms.Anubha Goel and Mr.Mayank Joshi, Advocates for JD No. 6 to 8.

¶7

This is a digitally signed order.

¶8

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/07/2025 at 12:47:01

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶10

O R D E R % 21.07.2025

¶11

Mr.Rishabh Bansal, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the decree-holder in OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 23/2019 submits that the parties he represents, have already entered into a settlement with the petitioners in the instant petitions i.e. OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 38/2019 and OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 51/2019. He also submits that the parties in the instant petitions, therefore, lost their interest.

¶12

The Court notes that since, some of the parties to the instant petitions have already entered into a settlement and have assigned their rights and interests in the property in question; therefore, the EX.APPL.(OS) 226/2025 in OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 23/2019 has been filed.

¶13

Since, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners in the instant petitions, the same are accordingly dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of CPC.

¶14

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶15

JULY 21, 2025 Nc/sph

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/07/2025 at 12:47:01

Nisha Singh & Anr. v. Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nisha Singh & Anr. v. Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Incedo Technology Solutions Limited Vs Suchismita Pradhan & Ors.

Sammaan Capital Ltd. Vs Bhupinder Singh Rana & Ors.

Suresh Kumar Paladugu Vs Niall Sadh, Tcg Studios & Ors.

County Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Cdpl) Vs Samarth Ad Protex Pvt. Ltd. (Sapl) & Anr.

Manoj Kumar Vs Kedar Nath Jhanb

Ashutosh Alok Mandelia Vs Ambareesh Avadhesh Mandelia and Ors.