Dismissed¶17

Sammaan Capital Ltd. v. Bhupinder Singh Rana & Ors.

Delhi HC18 Jul 2025CS(OS)/257/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of civil suit; Order XIII Rule 1 application; settlement between parties; defendants' undertaking not to make defamatory comments; liberty to reinstitute suit; 50% court fee refund; Sammaan Capital Ltd.; Bhupinder Singh Rana & Ors.; CS(OS) 257/2025; I.A. 16951/2025; I.A. 10550/2025; I.A. 14125/2025; Delhi High Court; Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; order dated 18.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the plaintiff to withdraw the civil suit; suit and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to reinstitute; 50% of court fee to be refunded to the plaintiff. ¶17

Sammaan Capital Ltd. Vs Bhupinder Singh Rana & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~O-31

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 257/2025 SAMMAAN CAPITAL LTD. .....Plaintiff

¶4

Through: Mr. Rajeev Nayar, Sr. Adv with Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, and Mr. Harshit Kiran, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

BHUPINDER SINGH RANA & ORS. .....Defendants

¶7

Through: Mr. Deepak Gogia, Mr. Aaddhar Nautiyal and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advs.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 18.07.2025

¶10

I.A. 16951/2025 (BY PLAINTIFF U/O-13, RULE 1 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF PRESENT SUIT)

¶11

Having heard in the instant application, it appears that the matter has been settled between them.

¶12

An averment has been made in paragraph 7 and 8 of the instant application stating that defendant no.1-3 have undertaken not to make any defamatory comments, and, therefore, the plaintiff without prejudice to its rights and contentions seeks liberty to withdraw the civil suit.

¶13

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the instant application, the Court deems it appropriate to allow the same and grants the liberty to the plaintiff to withdraw the civil suit.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2025 at 12:56:35

¶16

The application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 257/2025 and I.A. 10550/2025, I.A. 14125/2025

¶17

Consequent to the aforesaid order passed in the application for withdrawal i.e. I.A. 16951/2025, the instant civil suit, along with pending applications, stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to reinstitute it again, if so necessitate.

¶18

The Registry is directed that 50% of the Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff.

¶19

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶20

JULY 18, 2025 aks/@m.

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2025 at 12:56:35

Sammaan Capital Ltd. v. Bhupinder Singh Rana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sammaan Capital Ltd. v. Bhupinder Singh Rana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashval Vaderaa Vs Kanishka Vaderaa

Anila Malhotra Vs Sushma Soni & Ors.

Sonu Ahluwalia Vs Paramjeet Singh Reen & Ors.

Shri Parveen Kumar Vs Shri Des Raj

Ashutosh Alok Mandelia Vs Ambareesh Avadhesh Mandelia and Ors.

Vinod Rajoria Vs Mohinder Kumar Verma

Mrs Sunita Kumari Ganotra Vs Shri Vinod Kumar & Ors.

Sh. Rajbir Singh and Anr. Vs Sh. Pawwan Khanna and Anr.

Harsh Bhargav & Anr. Vs Sh. Diwaker Bansal & Ors.

Sonu Ahluwalia Vs Paramjeet Singh Reen & Ors.

Master Akshat Mehndirata Vs Deepak Mehndirata & Ors.

Incedo Technology Solutions Limited Vs Suchismita Pradhan & Ors.

Suresh Kumar Paladugu Vs Niall Sadh, Tcg Studios & Ors.

County Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Cdpl) Vs Samarth Ad Protex Pvt. Ltd. (Sapl) & Anr.