Allowed petition for extension of Arbitral Tribunal's mandate by six months due to voluminous documents causing delay; regularized delay period.
Extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate for six months and regularization of the delay period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
ADANI ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aditya Shankar Prasad, Adv. versus
M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kanwar Kacchar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 14.08.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2025 at 12:23:07
JASMEET SINGH, J
AUGUST 14, 2025/ DM
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2025 at 12:23:07
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been explained for the delay in concluding the arbitral proceedings.
Whether the petition for extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate by six months should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ADANI ENTERPRISES
M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
JASMEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
