In two cross-filed O.M.Ps regarding extension of an arbitrator's mandate in an arbitration between partners, the Delhi High Court allowed the petitions and extended the arbitrator's term by nine months upon the written consent of both parties.
Mandate of the Arbitrator extended by 9 months from 05.07.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~84 and 85
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
I.A. 16872/2025 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 543/2025
I.A. 16880/2025 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 545/2025
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 543/2025 & O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 545/2025
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 543/2025 & connected matter
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2025 at 12:22:26
JYOTI SINGH, J
JULY 18, 2025/shivam
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 543/2025 & connected matter
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2025 at 12:22:26
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator should be extended upon consent of parties.
To what extent should the mandate of the Arbitrator be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh. Dharmender Verma
Sh. Taken Das Chabba
Taken Dass Chhabra
Dharmender Verma
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
