Sterling and Wilson Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mata Amritanandamayi Math

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 509/2025

¶4

STERLING AND WILSON PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi, Advocate (Through VC)

¶6

versus

¶7

MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI MATH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Ashok Malik, Ms. Swati Mishra, Mr. Nitish Pande, Mr. Amish Kumar and Mr. Sarthak, Advocates

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 07.07.2025

¶10

I.A. 15580/2025 (Application for exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.

¶13

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 509/2025

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act of 1996’) seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for the period of six (6) months, enabling the Arbitral Tribunal to pass the award.

¶15

It is stated that Respondent had awarded to the Petitioner the work contract vide Letter of Award dated 03.08.2018 (‘Letter dated 03.08.2018’) for carrying out the supply, installation, testing and commissioning of the plumbing works at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences.

¶16

It is stated that dispute had arisen between the parties and thereafter, Arbitral Tribunal was constituted on 01.06.2022.

¶17

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 509/2025

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:43:13

¶20

It is stated that arguments were concluded on 20.09.2024 and the matter was reserved by the Arbitral Tribunal for passing of the award. It is stated that mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has expired on 13.04.2025. It is stated that thereafter, the Arbitral Tribunal issued fresh direction on 06.06.2025 calling upon the parties to seek extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. It is stated that therefore, the present petition has been filed.

¶21

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that parties have learnt that there was a medical emergency in the family of the Presiding Arbitrator and therefore, there has been a delay in publishing the award.

¶22

Issue notice. Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of Respondent. He states that he has no objection to the relief sought. 9. Learned counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent states that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for publishing of the award be extended till 30.09.2025.

¶23

In view of the consent of the parties, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for making the award is extended till 30.10.2025.

¶24

With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

¶25

The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.

¶26

JULY 7, 2025/ rhc

¶27

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶28

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 509/2025

¶29

Page 2 of 2

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:43:13

Sterling and Wilson Pvt. Ltd. v. Mata Amritanandamayi Math

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sterling and Wilson Pvt. Ltd. v. Mata Amritanandamayi Math

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Express Food Services Vs Indian Raiwlay Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited

Offshore Infrastructures Ltd. Vs Western Concessions Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Anjani Industries Vs M/S Manjeet Plastic Industries

M/S Medical Products Service Vs M/S Parnika Commercial and Estate Pvt. Ltd.

Micromax Informatics Limited Vs M/S Shree Vinayak Enterprises

M/S Nsc Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Airports Authority of India

Brijesh Kumar and Associates Vs Delhi Development Authority

M/S Jap Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

Offshore Infrastructures Ltd. Vs Western Concessions Pvt. Ltd.

Poonam Gandhi Vs State (Nct) of Delhi & Ors.

Gulshan Babbar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jairaj Developers LLP Vs Varendhishakt Prdhiesubhaag

Sarwati Home Furnishings Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Nec Corporation India Private Limited Vs Directorate of Health Service