Bagrrys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajendra Mittal

Delhi HC3 Jul 2025O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/473/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 473/2025, Bagrrys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajendra Mittal, Delhi High Court, decided 03.07.2025 by Jyoti Singh, J. Extension of arbitral mandate under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; sole Arbitrator appointed on 19.01.2023 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 302/2022 (Section 9 petition); mandate earlier extended to 04.07.2025; extended by consent for one year from 05.07.2025; proceedings at stage of amended List of Witnesses and affidavit evidence; no objection by Respondent; petition allowed and disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed and disposed of; mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by one year from 05.07.2025 with the consent of the parties. ¶¶22

Bagrrys India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajendra Mittal — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 473/2025

¶4

BAGRRYS INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Suhael Buttan, Mr. Vineet and Ms. Tanishka Khatana, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

RAJENDRA MITTAL .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Nehra, Mr. Nakashvir Singh Aulakh and Ms. Arushi Vig, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R % 03.07.2025

¶11

This petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal by a period of one year.

¶12

Disputes having arisen between the parties in relation to a Letter of Intent issued by the Petitioner on 21.03.2022 in favour of the Respondent, Petitioner issued termination notice dated 13.09.2022 pursuant to which Respondent filed a petition under Section 9 of 1996 Act in this Court being O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 302/2022. In the said petition, the Court appointed a sole Arbitrator on 19.01.2023 to adjudicate the disputes.

¶13

It is stated in the petition that during the 32^nd proceedings on 18.12.2024, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator, which was expiring on

¶14

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 473/2025

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2025 at 12:11:05

¶18

03.01.2025, was extended by six months upto 04.07.2025, with the consent of the parties. It is further stated that the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of filing of amended List of Witnesses along with evidence by way of affidavit on behalf of the Petitioner herein, which is the Respondent in the arbitral proceedings. In this backdrop, extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator is sought.

¶19

Issue notice.

¶20

Ms. Aakanksha Nehra, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent and on instructions, submits that Respondent has no objection to the extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶21

Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of one year from 05.07.2025.

¶22

Petition is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶23

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶24

JULY 03, 2025 S.Sharma

¶25

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 473/2025

¶26

Page 2 of 2

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2025 at 12:11:05

Bagrrys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajendra Mittal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bagrrys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajendra Mittal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Emerald Industries Vs Tata Aldesa Jv

Ansaldo Signal Consortium and Anr. Vs North Central Railway Project Unit

M/S Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. Vs Oil Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

Sivanssh Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs Army Welfare Housing Organisation

Express Food Services Vs Indian Raiwlay Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited

Offshore Infrastructures Ltd. Vs Western Concessions Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Anjani Industries Vs M/S Manjeet Plastic Industries

M/S Medical Products Service Vs M/S Parnika Commercial and Estate Pvt. Ltd.

Shubham Infrastructure Private Limited Vs M/S Aaa Hospitality through Its Partner Abhinav Seth and Ors.

Emerald Industries Vs Tata Aldesa Jv

Mrs Anisha Malhotra Vs Mr Ashoo Malhotra & Ors.

Parsvnath Estate Developers Private Limited Vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Private Limited

Affordable Infrastructure and Housing Projects Private Limited Vs M/S Happyeasygo India Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Oriental Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.