Mohinder Pal Kamboj v. M/S Fiitjee Limited

Delhi HC7 Jul 2025O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/329/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 29A(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; extension of mandate of Arbitral Tribunal; six months extension to make and publish award; condonation of 35-day delay in re-filing; section 151 CPC 1908; Delhi High Court O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 329/2025; Mohinder Pal Kamboj v M/s FIITJEE Limited; Jasmeet Singh J; 07.07.2025; period from 26.01.2025 regularised.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by 6 months from 07.07.2025 to make and publish the Award; the period from 26.01.2025 till 07.07.2025 regularised. The petition and the two companion I.A.s were thereafter disposed of. ¶¶25

Mohinder Pal Kamboj Vs M/S Fiitjee Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~61

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 329/2025

¶4

MOHINDER PAL KAMBOJ .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Sanjay Visen & Ms.Sangeeta Bala, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S FIITJEE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kushboo Singhal, Adv.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 07.07.2025

¶11

I.A. No. 9622/2025

¶12

Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The applicant(s) shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted documents, compliant with practice rules before the next date of hearing.

¶14

The application is disposed of.

¶15

I.A. No. 9623/2025

¶16

This is an application filed under section 151 of CPC, 1908 seeking condonation of delay of 35 days in re-filing the present petition.

¶17

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 35 days in refiling the petition is hereby condoned.

¶18

The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶19

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 329/2025

¶20

This is a petition filed under section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:17:22

¶22

Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 12 months.

¶23

It is stated that the respondent had taken time and hence, the delay.

¶24

Issue notice. 10. Ms. Singhal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has no objection to the petition being allowed.

¶25

For the reasons noted above, I am of the view that sufficient cause has been explained for the delay. The petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 6 months from today to make and publish the Award.

¶26

The period from 26.01.2025 till today stands regularised.

¶27

The petition is disposed of.

¶28

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶29

JULY 7, 2025/ as

¶30

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:17:22

Mohinder Pal Kamboj v. M/S Fiitjee Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohinder Pal Kamboj v. M/S Fiitjee Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Express Food Services Vs Indian Raiwlay Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited

Offshore Infrastructures Ltd. Vs Western Concessions Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Anjani Industries Vs M/S Manjeet Plastic Industries

M/S Medical Products Service Vs M/S Parnika Commercial and Estate Pvt. Ltd.

Micromax Informatics Limited Vs M/S Shree Vinayak Enterprises

M/S Nsc Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Airports Authority of India

Brijesh Kumar and Associates Vs Delhi Development Authority

M/S Jap Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited Vs Vistra Itcl (India) Limited

Inderjit Mehta Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

M/S Ve Commercial Vehicles Limited through Authorised Representative Shri Vipin Surana Vice Presid Vs M/S Shri Krishna Motor Company & Ors.

M/S Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. Vs Union of India

Sms Limited Vs Bharat Electronics Limited

Magic Software Private Limited Vs Engineer.Ai India Private Limited & Anr.