The Delhi High Court allowed an application seeking extension of an arbitral tribunal's mandate by six months. The court extended the mandate from 30.10.2024, validating any subsequent proceedings, with no objection from the respondent.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by six months from 30.10.2024; proceedings after expiry validated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
COLOUR INDIA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sachiin Bajpai, Advocate
versus
NAGPAL CHOLE BHATURE .....Respondent Through: Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
I.A. 481/2025 (exemption)
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 23/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:32:16
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
JANUARY 16, 2025 na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:32:16
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended by six months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Whether proceedings conducted after the expiry of the extended mandate require validation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Colour India
Nagpal Chole Bhature
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
