Dismissed
Vinita v. Suryakant Aditya
Delhi HCMAT.APP.(F.C.)/374/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In the absence of the appellant, who was noted in 2024 as wishing to withdraw the appeal, this Court dismissed the appeal in default and for non-prosecution on 23.01.2025.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~63
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 374/2023 VINITA .....Appellant Through: versus SURYAKANT ADITYA .....Respondent Through:
¶3
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 23.01.2025
¶4
- Despite passover, none appears on behalf of the appellant.
¶5
- Record reveals that when this matter was listed on 29.05.2024, this Court had noted that learned counsel for the appellant had indicated that the appellant wishes to withdraw the appeal but since her counsel had not received any instructions in this regard, the matter was, accordingly, adjourned.
¶6
- In the light of the aforesaid, it appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
¶7
REKHA PALLI, J
¶8
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
¶9
JANUARY 23, 2025 kk
¶10
This is a digitally signed order.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vinita
- respondent
Suryakant Aditya
Coram
AI extract
Rekha Palli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court