Khushboo Sahrawat Vs Kunal Balhara

¶1

$~33 & 34

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 221/2023 KHUSHBOO SAHRAWAT .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Ms. Daksha Arora and Ms. Sakshi Pareek, Advs. with appellant in person.

¶4

versus

¶5

KUNAL BALHARA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Adv. 34 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 222/2023, CM APPL. 38639/2023 KUNAL BALHARA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

KHUSHBOO SAHRAWAT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Ms. Daksha Arora and Ms. Sakshi Pareek, Advs. with respondent in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶10

O R D E R % 22.01.2025

¶11

The present appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, one by the husband and other by the wife, filed assailing the order dated 02.05.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-01, South East District, Saket Courts in HMA No.186/2022. Vide the impugned order, the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [the Act] filed by the wife who is the appellant in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 221/2023 was allowed

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:44:59

¶14

by directing the respondent husband [appellant in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 222/2023] to pay monthly interim maintenance of Rs.1,00,000/- to her. Vide order dated 10.01.2024, this Court had by way of an interim arrangement directed that instead of the monthly sum of Rs.1,00,000/- payable to the wife, in terms of the interim order, a sum of Rs.50,000/- per month be paid to her during the pendency of the present appeals. The said amount is, admittedly, being paid to the appellant wife who has also received the arrears on the said rate of Rs.50,000/- from the date of filing of the application under Section 24 of the Act.

¶15

Both sides inform us that during the pendency of the present appeals, final arguments in HMA No.186/2022 have already been addressed before the learned Family Court and the matter is now listed before the Court on 07.02.2025 for clarifications. The parties, therefore, expect that the judgment in the main petition will be rendered shortly.

¶16

In the light of this admitted position and taking into account that the wife Ms. Khushboo Sahrawat is, pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, being paid an interim monthly maintenance of Rs.50,000/-, we are of the view that no useful purpose will be served in considering the present appeals on merits at this stage when the final judgment in the main petition before the learned Family Court is itself likely to be rendered shortly.

¶17

Accordingly, we dispose of the appeals by directing that the interim arrangement of the wife receiving a monthly sum of Rs.50,000/- as maintenance, would continue till the disposal of the HMA No.186/2022 by the learned Family Court.

¶18

However, taking into account that both sides are aggrieved by the interim order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:44:59

¶20

while disposing of the appeals, in the aforesaid terms, we direct the learned Family Court, to decide the final maintenance/ alimony, without being influenced by the findings rendered in the impugned order.

¶21

The appeals, along with the pending applications, are accordingly disposed of.

¶22

REKHA PALLI, J

¶23

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶24

JANUARY 22, 2025 bh

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:44:59

Khushboo Sahrawat v. Kunal Balhara

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khushboo Sahrawat v. Kunal Balhara

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aditi Grover Vs Rahi Grover

Pankaj Kumar Dahiya Vs Kiran Panwar

Shashi Vs Arya Kumar

Pallavi Vs Gaurav Dabas

Abhay Kumar Vs Priya Prakash

Vinita Vs Suryakant Aditya

Sh. Rajan @ Ranjan Gupta Vs Smt. Priyanka Gupta

Neeru Mehta and Ors. Vs Sachin Puri

Gurudwara Shri Gur Singh Sabha Regd through Its General Secretary Vs Sh Ravi Prakash Sharma and Ors.

Delhi Development Authority Vs Ravi Prakash Sharma & Anr.

M/S Manappuram Finance Ltd. Vs Asish Bhasin

Kunal Balhara Vs Khushboo Sahrawat

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal and Ors. Vs Suresh Kumar & Ors.

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. Vs Lokesh