Applications for withdrawal of appeals due to a settlement agreement between the parties were allowed. The main appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Payment terms were confirmed.
Applications for withdrawal were allowed; appeals were dismissed as withdrawn. Next hearing cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~72 & 73
YAMINI GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. A. N. Aggarwal, Ms.Nupur Sachdeva, Ms.Sonia, Ms.Hemlata Garg and Ms.Parikshit Bajaj, Advs. Appellant through VC.
versus
GAURAV GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Dinkar Singh, Mr.Rohit Singh, Advs. with respondent in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR
O R D E R
% 15.05.2025 CM APPL. 29516/2025 in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 352/2024 CM APPL. 29514/2025 in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 353/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2025 at 14:55:35
execution of the Settlement Agreement and to remain bound by the same. The respondent also hands over a Demand Draft dated 06.05.2025 bearing no.999773 of Axis Bank Ltd. Green Park, New Delhi of Rs.30 lac to the learned counsel for the appellant, in terms of the Settlement Agreement.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
RENU BHATNAGAR, J
MAY 15, 2025/Arya/ik
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2025 at 14:55:35
Yamini Gupta
Gaurav Gupta
Navin Chawla
Renu Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
