Appeal against a Family Court order directing children's school admission and custody handover. Parties amicably agreed to admit the children to Vivekanand Public School, Anand Vihar, sharing expenses equally. Custody remains with the respondent until the next date; the Family Court to decide custody and interim visitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 09.05.2025
versus
SONIA CHOUDHARY .....Respondent Through: Mr.Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Mr.Rohit Kalar, Mr.Jitender Kumar, Mr.Ravinder Tomar, Mr.Shivam Mishra, Advs. with respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 176/2025 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 19:08:39
Page 1 of 3
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 176/2025 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 19:08:39
Page 2 of 3
14.05.2025, when the above petition is listed before it.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
RENU BHATNAGAR, J
MAY 9, 2025/Arya
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 176/2025 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 19:08:39
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Should the children be admitted to a mutually agreed school and how should admission expenses be shared?
How should interim custody be handled pending the Family Court's decision on custody?
Pushpender
Sonia Choudhary
Navin Chawla
Renu Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
