Dismissed¶18

Meenakshi Gautam v. Sanjay Gautam

Delhi HC20 Aug 2025MAT.APP.(F.C.)/250/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; MAT.APP.(F.C.) 250/2023; CM APPLs.44405/2023 & 49452/2025; Meenakshi Gautam v. Sanjay Gautam; withdrawal of appeal; dismissed as withdrawn; Section 19 Family Courts Act, 1984; Order dated 16.05.2023 Family Court North District Rohini; decree of divorce Order dated 25.04.2025; another Appeal against divorce decree; fresh application seeking grant of maintenance; leave and liberty granted; no objection by Respondent; bench: Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, JJ.; decision date 20.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty that the withdrawal shall not prejudice the Appellant's rights and interests, including liberty to file a fresh application seeking grant of maintenance during the pendency of the Appeal against the decree of divorce dated 25.04.2025. ¶18

Meenakshi Gautam Vs Sanjay Gautam — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 250/2023 & CM APPLs.44405/2023 & 49452/2025

¶4

MEENAKSHI GAUTAM .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Mr. Archit Rajput, Ms. Shagun Saproo, Mr. Karandeep Singh & Ms. Nupur Singh, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

SANJAY GAUTAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, Ms.Saumya Tiwari and Mr. Bishnu Prasad Tiwari, Advocates

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶10

O R D E R % 20.08.2025

¶11

By way of the present Appeal, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the Appellant has impugned the Order dated 16.05.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, North District, Rohini Court, Delhi.

¶12

Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks to withdraw the present Appeal in view of the fact that, vide Order dated 25.04.2025, the learned Family Court has already granted a decree of divorce, against which the Appellant has preferred another Appeal.

¶13

Learned counsel for the Appellant further seeks the liberty that such withdrawal of the present Appeal may not prejudice the rights and interests of the Appellant, particularly as the Appellant intends to

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2025 at 12:08:18

¶16

file a fresh application seeking grant of maintenance during the pendency of the said Appeal. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that he has no objections to this request.

¶17

Leave and liberty, as sought for, is granted.

¶18

In view thereof, the present Appeal, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶19

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J

¶20

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J

¶21

AUGUST 20, 2025/rk

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2025 at 12:08:18

Meenakshi Gautam v. Sanjay Gautam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meenakshi Gautam v. Sanjay Gautam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhinav Batra Vs Manvi Hora

Girish Kumar Gangadharan Vs Pranamika Nair

Shashi Vs Arya Kumar & Anr.

Sarita Sharma Vs Maya Devi through Savita

Rasila Singh Gill Vs Jasrup Kaur Ahluwalia

Priyanka Vs Yudhvir Chhikara

Gurjeet Singh Vs Rajender Kaur

Manoj Kumar Vs Priyanka & Anr.

Abhinav Batra Vs Manvi Hora

Girish Kumar Gangadharan Vs Pranamika Nair

Shashi Vs Arya Kumar & Anr.

Jitenderpal Singh HUF Vs M/S Oyo Apartments Investments (Llp)

Sameer Pareek Vs Shweta Pareek Nee Bhatt

Dilshad Khan Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi