Yamini Sagar v. Vishal Sagar

Delhi HC14 Oct 2025MAT.APP.(F.C.)/188/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 188/2022, Yamini Sagar v. Vishal Sagar, Delhi High Court, order dated 14.10.2025; matrimonial appeal against divorce decree dated 31.08.2022 (S.13(1)(ia), (ib), (iii) HMA) disposed of as infructuous on account of Settlement Deed between parties; complaints and cases withdrawn; some compliances pending; liberty to file revival application; appeal under S.19 Family Courts Act, 1984 read with S.28 HMA; appellant's appearance not given; respondent represented by Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate.

What did the court decide?

Appeal, along with pending application(s), if any, disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to the parties to file an application for revival in case the agreed-upon compliances are not made. ¶¶17

Yamini Sagar Vs Vishal Sagar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 188/2022

¶4

YAMINI SAGAR .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Appearance not given

¶6

versus

¶7

VISHAL SAGAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate through video conferencing

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶10

O R D E R % 14.10.2025

¶11

The present Appeal, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [“ HMA ”], assails the Judgement dated 31.08.2022 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari courts, Delhi, whereby the petition filed by the Respondent seeking divorce from the Appellant under Section 13(1)(ia), (ib) and (iii) of the HMA, has been allowed.

¶12

Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate, who is stated to be appearing on behalf of Respondent admits that a Settlement Deed has been executed between the parties and, in compliance thereof, certain complaints and cases have already been withdrawn. However, since certain compliances are yet to be made by the Appellant, it is prayed that the present Appeal be kept pending.

¶13

This Court has considered the submissions advanced by learned

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:20:28

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent, however, finds no reason to keep the present Appeal pending.

¶17

Accordingly, the present Appeal, along with pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to the parties to file an application for revival of the same in case the agreed upon compliances are not made.

¶18

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J

¶19

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J OCTOBER 14, 2025/rk/rn/va

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:20:28

Yamini Sagar v. Vishal Sagar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yamini Sagar v. Vishal Sagar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yatish Malik Vs Chesta Ganotra

Mahima Kore Vs Amit Kore

Vivek Nagrath Vs Divya Goglani

Preeti Gupta Vs Deepanshu Gupta

Akash Sharma Vs Megha

Sumit Phatela Vs Bharti Khurana

Puneet Rastogi Vs Priyanka Rohatgi

Deepak Goel Vs Dolly Gupta

M/S Surge Industries Ltd. and Ors. Vs Kamal Gupta and Anr.

M/S Taneja Paints and Hardware Store & Anr. Vs M/S Akzo Nobel India Limited

Sandeep Sajjankumar Jhunjhunwala Vs Sandeep Jhunjhunwala & Ors.

Smita Jina Vs Amit Kumar Jina

Sagar Faujdar Vs Shailja Yadav

Rohit Kumar Vs Iti Kumar