Dismissed

Shishir Chand v. Central Information Commission & Anr.

Delhi HC23 Jan 2025LPA/36/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellant in person sought permission in an LPA arising from RTI-related writ proceedings; after arguments he withdrew the appeal with liberty to seek review of the Single Judge's order limited to prayer (i). The Division Bench dismissed the application as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to seek review of the Single Judge's order limited to prayer (i); LPA dismissed as withdrawn.

Shishir Chand Vs Central Information Commission & Anr. — RTI and Transparency | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 36/2024

¶4

SHISHIR CHAND .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Petitioner in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR.

¶8

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr. Bhanu Gulati, Ms. Anum Hussain, Ms. Yamini Singh and Mr. Sourabh Kumar, Advocates for R-2

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶11

% 23.01.2025

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

This Court on 07.02.2024 passed the following order:-

¶14

1. After some arguments, the appellant, who appears in person, states that he confines his writ petition to prayer '(i)'.

¶15

2. Consequently, prayers '(ii)', '(iii)', '(iv)' and '(v)' are dismissed as not pressed.

¶16

3. The appellant states that Special Leave Petitions being SLP(C) Nos. 10861/2023 and 10862/2023 are likely to be heard finally by the Supreme Court on 7^th March, 2024.

¶17

4. To await the orders of the Supreme Court, list on 30"' April, 2024.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, the appellant who appears in person was asked to address the Court only in respect of the prayer (i) made in this LPA.

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2025 at 14:26:14

¶21

However, after arguing at some length, he states that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant LPA with liberty to seek review of the order passed by the learned Single Judge only to the extent of prayer (i) made herein.

¶22

Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

¶23

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶24

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶25

JANUARY 23, 2025/j

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2025 at 14:26:14

Shishir Chand v. Central Information Commission & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shishir Chand v. Central Information Commission & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajni Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Sanjeev Gupta Vs Registrar General, Delhi High Court

R K Sharma Vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. through Its CEO and Anr.

Ms. Varuna Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pc Jeweller Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.