Disposed¶23

Sanjeev Gupta v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court

Delhi HC22 Jan 2025W.P.(C)/785/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 785/2025; Sanjeev Gupta v. Registrar General Delhi High Court; public interest litigation; e-filing portal; defect raising; cure of defects; listing of fresh matters; expired matters; Dy Number registration; auto email/SMS intimation; consolidated defect raising; administrative side versus judicial side; PIL closed without notice; Upadhyaya CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela J; decision 22 January 2025.

What did the court decide?

The Court held it was not apposite to issue any notice on the judicial side in the present PIL. ¶22

Sanjeev Gupta Vs Registrar General, Delhi High Court — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~49

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 785/2025

¶4

SANJEEV GUPTA ...Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT ...Respondent

¶7

Through: Mr. Samar Kachwaha, Ms. Shivangi Nanda, Mr. Gaurav Vasisth and Mr. Harshwardhan Thakur, Advocates.

¶8

% Date of Decision: 22^nd January, 2025

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶10

JUDGMENT

¶11

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J : (ORAL)

¶12

Present public interest litigation has been filed inter alia seeking the following prayers:-

¶13

“In view of the above, It is most respectfully prayed to this Hon’ble court for appropriate direction to the respondent for proper & timebound scrutiny, defect raising of the fresh matters for listing in the interest of first declaration of constitution i.e. access to “justice” to all inter-alia as below:

¶14

a) Time limit be imposed for processing of fresh matters for listing preferably with time limit for curing defects be imposed.

¶15

b) That on default for curing defects within prescribed time the matter be transferred to expired matters in the e-filing portal

¶16

Signature Not Verified

¶17

Digitally Signed By:MADHU SARDANA Signing Da te:2 7.01.2025 11:25:35

¶18

W.P.(C) 785/2025

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

c) That provision in the e-filing software5 to provide details of registration of the Dy Number e-filed with auto email/SMS intimation of the registration to the petitioner

¶21

d) That the endeavor to raise defects in consolidated manner instead of raising multiple times. In all matters (not selectively) after obtaining undertaking that “the matter be listed irrespective of defects a petitioner’s own risk” this practice of listing be followed uniformly”

¶22

We have heard Mr. Gupta, the petitioner in person. We do not find it apposite to issue any notice on the judicial side in the present PIL whereby the petitioner seeks to draw attention to certain purported deficiencies and lacunae in the filing/raising of defects, clearing of such defects and the listing of matters thereafter before the Court. Suffice it to state that the issues, if found to be relevant, would be taken up on the administrative side of this Court.

¶23

In that view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed and the PIL stands closed.

¶24

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶25

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶26

JANUARY 22, 2025/ rl

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally SignedBy:MADHU SARDANA W.P.(C) 785/2025 Signing Da te:2 7.01.2025 11:25:35

¶29

Page 2 of 2

Sanjeev Gupta v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Gupta v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Sh. Sunil Solanki

Shri Sanjar Fazal Alam and Ors. Vs Union of India

Gitarattan International Business School Under the Aegis of Rohini Educational Society Vs Directorate of Higher Education Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Om Prakash Lakhina Vs UOI & Ors.

UOI and Ors. Vs Ashu and Ors.

Rajender Jain and Ors. Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Vishvanath Agarwal Vs Election Commission of India and Ors.

UOI and Ors. Vs Chinmay Garg and Ors.

Rajni Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

R K Sharma Vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. through Its CEO and Anr.

Ms. Varuna Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.