Appeal against an order dismissing interim injunction and allowing the respondent's Order XXXIX Rule 4 application. With all project flats sold and the suit listed for final hearing, the court disposed of the appeal, directing the respondent not to use the mark till final adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
CENTERL PARK ESTATES PVT LD & ORS .....Decree Holders Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and Mr. Yashwant Singh Baghel, Advocate.
versus
SANKALP CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 09.01.2025
Page 1 of 2
FAO-IPD 11/2022
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:38:53
project have already been sold by the respondent.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 9, 2025
Vivek/-
Page 2 of 2
FAO-IPD 11/2022
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:38:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against dismissal of interim injunction should continue pending when the suit is due for final hearing before the trial court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Centerl Park Estates Pvt Ltd & Ors
Sankalp Constructions Pvt Ltd
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
