Suit and trademark rectification petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner/plaintiff failed to appear despite notice of default and multiple listings; respondent's affidavit of use of the mark was on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3 & 4
RAICAM S.P.A. .....Petitioner Through: None. versus MR. HAR CHARAN SINGH AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Ms. Zeba T. Khan, Ms. Sheril Bhatia, Ms. Ekta Nayar Saini and Mr. Varun Kajla, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 10.01.2025
Page 1 of 2
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 33/2022 & connected
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 13:00:45
‘ MAFF’/ (label) had been abandoned.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 10, 2025/ kd
Page 2 of 2
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 33/2022 & connected
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 13:00:45
RAICAM S.P.A.
HAR CHARAN SINGH
ANR
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
