Ravi Raj Soulanki v. M/S Kry Forever LLP & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
3/2025 Page 1 of 4 $~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAVI RAJ SOULANKI .....Appellant Through: Ms.Swathi Sukukmar, Sr. Adv. Ms.Neha Khanduri, Mr.Ritik Raghuwanshi, Ms.Komal Sharma, Advs.
versus
M/S KRY FOREVER LLP & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Neeraj Grover, Mr.Mohit Sharma, Mr.Ankur Tiwari, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
“25. (i) For the forgoing reasons and till further orders, the defendant(s) by itself/themselves as also through his/their
FAO(COMM) 3/2025 Page 1 of 4
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 5.01.2025 11:50:34
individual proprietors/partners/directors, agents, representatives, franchisee, employees, assigns, heirs, successors, and all others acting for and on their behalf are hereby restrained from using, selling, soliciting, exporting, displaying, advertising (including in audio, print, visual/social media or otherwise), directly or indirectly or dealing in any other manner or mode in the impugned artistic work under the impugned Trademark/label/logo 'THE CRUSH COFFEE/THE CRUSH
COFFEE/ or any other Trademark/label/logo/artistic feature which is or which may be identical with and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's said Trademark/label/logo/artistic work 'THE
COFFEE CONCEPT/ and its
acronyms label and Tag line/Punch line 'COFFEE SOLVES EVERTIIING' in relation to their impugned goods/services and business of management of restaurants and café, on-line ordering services in the field of restaurants, café, take-out and delivery, franchising services and also engaged in Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice as fall under class 30 as per Nice classification of Trademark and other allied & cognate business and services or from doing any other acts or deeds, thereby infringing plaintiff's registered trademark(s),
Signature Not Verified
2 of 4
Digitally Signed FAO(COMM) 3/2025 Page By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 5.01.2025 11:50:34
copyright and passing off their products as that of plaintiff.”
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 5.01.2025 11:50:34
FAO(COMM) 3/2025 Page 3 of 4
filed by the appellant for the said mark.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
JANUARY 13, 2025/Arya/IK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
FAO(COMM) 3/2025 Page 4 of 4
Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 5.01.2025 11:50:34
1 issue framed by the court
Could an interim injunction for the mark 'The Crush Coffee' be granted despite earlier litigation before the Ahmedabad Commercial Court between the same parties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Raj Soulanki
M/S KRY FOREVER LLP
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court