Disposed

Hemant Kumar Goyal @ Harish Goyal v. Yashwant Jain & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Jan 2025FAO (COMM)/6/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against an interim injunction restraining use of trademarks relating to 'Chuski Chai'. Counsel confined the prayer to expeditious hearing of a proposed Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC application. The appeal was disposed of with directions for advance notice, a respondent response within a week, and expeditious trial court decision preferably within a month.

What the court decided

AI extract

Hemant Kumar Goyal @ Harish Goyal Vs Yashwant Jain & Anr. — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~62

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of decision: 13.01.2025

¶4

- FAO (COMM) 6/2025

¶5

HEMANT KUMAR GOYAL @ HARISH GOYAL

¶6

.....Appellant

¶7

Through: Mr. Nivesh Sharma, Ms. Ritu Singh & Mr. Aman Kashyap, Advs. with appellant in person.

¶8

versus

¶9

YASHWANT JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Mohit Sharma & Mr. Ankur Tiwari, Advs.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶12

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)

¶13

CM APPL.1582/2025

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

Application stands disposed of.

¶16

FAO(COMM) 6/2025 & CM APPL.1581/2025

¶17

The present appeal has been filed under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, “CPC”), seeking setting aside of Order dated 25.11.2024 passed by District Judge (Commercial Courts-01), North-West, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant was restrained from manufacturing, selling, using, displaying, advertising, importing, exporting and dealing in the

¶18

Signature Not Verified

¶19

Digitally Signed FAO (COMM) 6/2025 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:1 5.01.2025 17:40:35

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

trademarks “GOYAL CHUSKI CHAI”, “H.S.G. YASHIKA GOYAL CHUSKI CHAI” and “CHURKI”.

¶22

The learned counsel for the appellant confines his prayer to a request to the learned Trial Court to expedite the hearing of an application, which the appellant proposes to file under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC.

¶23

The learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, does not oppose the prayer made. He submits that he shall fully cooperate with the learned Trial Court to expedite the hearing of the application, if and when filed by the appellant.

¶24

We therefore, dispose of this appeal by directing that in case the appellant gives at least three days’ advance notice of the application proposed to be filed, to the respondents, the respondents shall appear on the first day of the listing of said application before the learned Trial Court, and file a response thereto, within a week thereafter.

¶25

The learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of such application, if filed, and decide the same preferably within a month of such filing.

¶26

In view of above, the appeal, along with the pending applications, is disposed of.

¶27

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶28

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶29

JANUARY 13, 2025/ab/sk/IK

¶30

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶31

Signature Not Verified

¶32

Digitally Signed FAO (COMM) 6/2025 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:1 5.01.2025 17:40:35

¶33

Page 2 of 2

Hemant Kumar Goyal @ Harish Goyal v. Yashwant Jain & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Hemant Kumar Goyal @ Harish Goyal v. Yashwant Jain & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kunwer Sachdev Vs Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd. & Anr.

Ramesh Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Narpat Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ravi Raj Soulanki Vs M/S Kry Forever LLP & Ors.