Delhi High Court FAO 302/2019 Divya Sood vs Rajat Gandhi; dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution / absence of appellant and counsel on 03.11.2025 and 17.11.2025; costs imposed; pending CM applications closed; single-judge order by Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha dated 17.11.2025.
Appeal dismissed with costs; pending application(s), if any, stand closed. ¶14
The appeal is dismissed with costs on account of non-prosecution, as neither the appellant nor her counsel appeared and the appellant appears not interested in prosecuting the case. ¶14
$~15
DIVYA SOOD .....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
RAJAT GANDHI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajesh Ratna, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
O R D E R % 17.11.2025
03.11.2025 there was no representation for the appellant. In the interest of justice, no adverse order was passed on the said date and the matter was adjourned to this day for hearing.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 14:27:08
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
NOVEMBER 17, 2025 Ni
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 14:27:08
How this case reached the court
On the last posting day (03.11.2025) there was no representation for the appellant; no adverse order was passed and the matter was adjourned to 17.11.2025 for hearing.¶12
On 17.11.2025, when the matter was taken up, neither the appellant nor her counsel was present; the court observed that the appellant did not appear interested in prosecuting the case.¶13
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
