First appeal against an order in a probate case was dismissed for default after the appellant failed to appear on two consecutive hearings despite a final opportunity being granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
NARESH BUDHIRAJA .....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
SHALINI ARORA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal and Ms. Ritika Bansal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
17.11.2023 in Probate Case No.42267/2016 on the file of ADJ-06,
Central, THC Courts, Delhi.
appellant remained unrepresented. However, in the interest of
justice, no adverse order was passed and one final opportunity was
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:35:10
granted to the appellant to appear before this Court, either in
person or through learned counsel.
present. The appeal is dismissed for default.
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2025 mj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:35:10
Naresh Budhiraja
Shalini Arora
Chandrasekharan Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
