First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the appellant nor respondent no. 1 appeared on multiple dates and no one appeared for the appellant again.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-3
ISHWAD DAYAL .....Appellant
Through: None. versus SATYAWATI DEVI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA O R D E R % 11.12.2025
respondent no. 1.
there was no representation for both sides. Therefore, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present matter.
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
DECEMBER 11, 2025/rs
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2025 at 12:44:31
Ishwad Dayal
Satyawati Devi
Anr.
Chandrasekharan Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
