Dismissed
Mahinder Singh v. State
Delhi HCFAO/196/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated non-representation by both sides.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-2
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- FAO 196/2008 MAHINDER SINGH .....Appellant
¶4
Through: None. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: None.
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
¶6
O R D E R % 11.12.2025
¶7
- Today also, there is no representation for either side.
¶8
- On the last posting dates i.e., 27.11.2025 and 04.12.2025
¶9
there was no representation for both sides. Therefore, it appears
¶10
that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present matter.
¶11
- Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶12
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mahinder Singh
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Chandrasekharan Sudha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court